I start by clarifying that Christians do not need to believe all other religions are entirely wrong. Christianity only requires that where it differs from other religions, it is right, while other answers may vary in how close they are to truth. Humanity divides first into those who believe in God and those who do not, and then among believers, into two major views of God. One view sees God as beyond good and evil, where distinctions of right and wrong are human perspectives, as in Pantheism. The other sees God as righteous, concerned with morality, and taking sides between good and evil, as in Christianity. Pantheists view God as almost identical with the universe, while Christians see God as the creator, separate from the world, who made it intentionally and expects humans to correct what has gone wrong. This raises the problem of evil: if God is good, why is the world flawed? I initially resisted Christian answers, finding atheism simpler. Yet I realized that my very judgment of the universe as unjust presupposes a standard of justice. This means that even in trying to deny God, I assumed an objective sense of right and wrong. Thus, atheism turns out to be too simple: the moral awareness within me implies a deeper order, a reality beyond mere material chaos.
Having found atheism too simple, I also reject what I call Christianity-and-water—a diluted faith that speaks only of a good God and a pleasant world, ignoring sin, evil, and redemption. Real Christianity is not simple because reality itself is not simple. Simplicity belongs to appearances, not to truth. If one truly investigates what is real—whether in science, morality, or religion—one must be prepared for mystery and difficulty. Those who dismiss Christianity for being complicated often misunderstand it or attack a childish version of it, not the mature doctrine that faces the full complexity of existence. Reality, in my experience, is both intricate and surprising. Its strangeness is one of the reasons I believe Christianity to be true; it is not a religion anyone could have invented, for it contains the same unexpectedness that marks real life. The problem we face is a universe containing evil and apparent meaninglessness, yet also creatures who recognize good and evil. Only two worldviews face this honestly: Christianity and Dualism. Christianity holds that the world was created good but has gone wrong; Dualism asserts two eternal, independent powers—one good, one evil—locked in endless conflict. Dualism, however, fails logically. If we call one power good and the other bad, we must have a standard beyond both, a moral law that distinguishes right from wrong. This standard points to a higher Being—the true God. Moreover, evil cannot exist on its own; it depends on goodness to corrupt. No one loves evil purely for its own sake—only for the pleasure, power, or safety that are themselves good things sought wrongly. Thus, wickedness is spoiled goodness, and evil is a parasite upon good. This insight explains why Christianity teaches that the devil is a fallen angel—a creature originally good who went wrong. Evil has no independent existence; even its power comes from what is good. Christianity therefore agrees with Dualism that a cosmic conflict exists, but it sees it as a rebellion within creation, not a battle between equal powers. The world is enemy-occupied territory. Christianity tells of the rightful King—Christ—who has entered this occupied world in disguise and calls His followers to join a campaign of resistance. Attending church becomes a secret act of allegiance, a communication with our true homeland, which the enemy seeks to prevent through pride, indifference, and doubt. In this light, the Christian doctrine of evil is neither naïve nor mythical. The devil is real, not as a comic figure but as a spiritual intelligence in rebellion. Those who truly wish to know him will find that the encounter is not one to desire. Christianity’s realism—its refusal of both atheistic denial and sentimental simplification—is what marks it as a faith capable of facing all the facts of existence.
The text explores the problem of evil, free will, and the divine nature of Christ. It explains that the existence of evil stems from God granting free will to His creatures, allowing them to choose right or wrong. Free will makes love and genuine goodness possible, even though it also permits evil. God considered this freedom worth the risk, as it enables meaningful relationships between humans and Himself. The text further argues that humanity’s attempt to find happiness apart from God inevitably fails because humans were created to depend on Him, just as a machine depends on the proper fuel. History’s repeated failures—wars, corruption, and moral decay—reflect humanity’s effort to “run on the wrong fuel.” It then traces God’s response: giving humanity conscience, revealing truth through moral insights and ancient religions, and choosing the Jewish people to reveal His nature. The narrative culminates in the appearance of Christ, who claimed divine authority to forgive sins and judge the world. Such claims, the text argues, leave no middle ground—Jesus must be either truly God or a deluded impostor. The conclusion insists that Christ’s humility and words only make sense if He is indeed the Son of God, rejecting the notion that He was merely a moral teacher.
The text confronts the reader with a decisive choice about Jesus’ identity—He must be either divine, deluded, or evil. The author accepts that He is truly God, who entered a fallen world to redeem humanity. The central focus of Christianity is not merely Jesus’ teaching but His death and resurrection, through which humanity is reconciled to God. The author clarifies that various theological theories explaining Christ’s death—such as substitution—are only attempts to describe the mystery, not the essence of Christianity itself. The true point is that His death works, even if its mechanics are beyond human understanding. Repentance is presented as the essential act of surrender, requiring the death of self. Humanity, unable to repent perfectly, needs divine help. God became man in Christ so that human nature could undergo this death and return to God. Through the union of divine and human, Jesus could suffer, die, and rise perfectly, accomplishing what humanity could not. The Atonement, then, is God’s direct intervention—Christ paying the human debt through His divine-human act of obedience and love.
The chapter presents the Christian understanding of how divine life—the “Christ-life”—is communicated to humanity. The perfect surrender and humiliation of Christ were both divine and human: perfect because He was God, and surrender because He was man. Through union with His humility and suffering, believers share in His victory over death and attain a new, perfected life. This transformation represents a new stage of existence, a kind of spiritual evolution already realized in Christ and transmitted through baptism, belief, and Holy Communion—the ordinary means by which divine life is imparted. These are not mere symbols but channels of divine operation, rooted in God’s creative use of material reality. The text affirms that faith rests upon trustworthy authority, as does most human knowledge. Yet, receiving the Christ-life requires personal participation: it must be nourished, sustained, and renewed through repentance and divine grace. Christians do not claim to become good in order to earn God’s love; rather, they are made good because God loves them and works through them. This divine life is not abstract or purely moral—it is incarnational and biological in character, making Christians part of Christ’s living body, through which He acts in the world. The essay concludes with an eschatological reflection: God will one day invade the world in unveiled glory, bringing an end to history. Until that moment, humanity is given time to choose—freely and decisively—whether to belong to God’s side. The call to decision is immediate and urgent, for the delay of divine intervention is itself an act of mercy.
Explore more books by the same author(s).